Open Stack

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>> So far in my testing I found 2 issues:
>>
>> - IPv6 + TLS doesn't work in tripleo-ci, certificates aren't good
>> (expected). We might need to generate new ones, I'll take a look
>> myself probably.
>>   http://logs.openstack.org/18/522618/2/check-tripleo/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha-oooq-ipv6/d21046c/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy_post.log.txt.gz#_2017-11-23_20_59_28
>
> I just found out there is a test-environments/enable-tls-ipv6.yaml -
> beautiful. Problem solved I guess.
>
>> - Running Tempest on OVB jobs with TLS doesn't work for me yet:
>>   http://logs.openstack.org/10/522310/6/check-tripleo/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha-oooq/ad6c2c1/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/tempest_output.log.txt.gz#_2017-11-23_21_03_57
>>   Any help on that one is welcome

I sent https://review.openstack.org/522677 which I think is the way to
go, any feedback is welcome.

>> Thanks,
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> I forgot to add an ongoing effort to reduce number of services
>>> deployed on ovb jobs at a strict minimum:
>>> https://review.openstack.org/522310
>>> So we hope to run the job faster and more efficiently. Our scenarios
>>> already cover services like Cinder, Heat and Swift. We don't need them
>>> anymore on OVB.
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Queens's main theme is stabilization.
>>>> That's what we're currently working on in our CI, see which areas we
>>>> can consolidate and stabilize so we can continue to scale TripleO
>>>> development.
>>>>
>>>> One of the challenges that we had in the last years was the high
>>>> demand of OVB jobs versus the capacity.
>>>> To address that, we recently decided to remove ovb-nonha. It was a good start.
>>>>
>>>> Now we have:
>>>> - ovb-ha which test introspection, Pacemaker, TLS, net-iso (multi-nics)
>>>> - ovb-containers which tested a containerized overcloud
>>>> - ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024: which was renamed from
>>>> ovb-updates and is supposed to test ipv6 overcloud, stack updates &
>>>> ceph. It doesn't test stack updates (since the switch to
>>>> tripleo-quickstart), and Ceph is already extensively tested in
>>>> multinode scenario001/004 jobs.
>>>>
>>>> That said, I think we can consolidate the OVB jobs in 2:
>>>>
>>>> - keep ovb-ha and containerize it in Queens and beyond: it was already
>>>> approved and change is being applied now:
>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522293/
>>>>   indeed, we decided as a community that we would stop supporting
>>>> non-containerized overclouds in Queens and beyond.
>>>> - remove ovb-containers in Queens and beyond: useless now, since we
>>>> have ovb-ha containerized: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522579/
>>>> - Remove ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024 and create ovb-ha-ipv6:
>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522618/
>>>>   indeed, ceph is already well tested in scenarios, ipv6 would be
>>>> tested in ovb-ha-ipv6.
>>>>   for overcloud updates, I haven't seen the feature in quickstart but
>>>> I might have missed something (any help here is welcome).
>>>>
>>>> At the end, we should end up with 2 OVB jobs:
>>>> - ovb-ha (could be renamed in ovb-ha-ipv4 if that helps)
>>>> - ovb-ha-ipv6
>>>>
>>>> Both would test the things that can't be tested by multinode:
>>>> - Nova / Ironic / Mistral workflow
>>>> - Introspection
>>>> - TLS
>>>> - Network Isolation
>>>> - IPv6 for the ovb-ha-ipv6
>>>> - Containerized overcloud
>>>>
>>>> As a result, we have more coverage (except for stack updates but it
>>>> needs to be addressed in quickstart first) and less jobs, so less
>>>> resources consumed.
>>>>
>>>> Any feedback on this plan is more than welcome,
>>>> --
>>>> Emilien Macchi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Emilien Macchi
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Emilien Macchi
>
>
>
> --
> Emilien Macchi



-- 
Emilien Macchi