Open Stack

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 1:49 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
> So far in my testing I found 2 issues:
>
> - IPv6 + TLS doesn't work in tripleo-ci, certificates aren't good
> (expected). We might need to generate new ones, I'll take a look
> myself probably.
>   http://logs.openstack.org/18/522618/2/check-tripleo/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha-oooq-ipv6/d21046c/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy_post.log.txt.gz#_2017-11-23_20_59_28

I just found out there is a test-environments/enable-tls-ipv6.yaml -
beautiful. Problem solved I guess.

> - Running Tempest on OVB jobs with TLS doesn't work for me yet:
>   http://logs.openstack.org/10/522310/6/check-tripleo/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha-oooq/ad6c2c1/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/tempest_output.log.txt.gz#_2017-11-23_21_03_57
>   Any help on that one is welcome
>
> Thanks,
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>> I forgot to add an ongoing effort to reduce number of services
>> deployed on ovb jobs at a strict minimum:
>> https://review.openstack.org/522310
>> So we hope to run the job faster and more efficiently. Our scenarios
>> already cover services like Cinder, Heat and Swift. We don't need them
>> anymore on OVB.
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> Queens's main theme is stabilization.
>>> That's what we're currently working on in our CI, see which areas we
>>> can consolidate and stabilize so we can continue to scale TripleO
>>> development.
>>>
>>> One of the challenges that we had in the last years was the high
>>> demand of OVB jobs versus the capacity.
>>> To address that, we recently decided to remove ovb-nonha. It was a good start.
>>>
>>> Now we have:
>>> - ovb-ha which test introspection, Pacemaker, TLS, net-iso (multi-nics)
>>> - ovb-containers which tested a containerized overcloud
>>> - ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024: which was renamed from
>>> ovb-updates and is supposed to test ipv6 overcloud, stack updates &
>>> ceph. It doesn't test stack updates (since the switch to
>>> tripleo-quickstart), and Ceph is already extensively tested in
>>> multinode scenario001/004 jobs.
>>>
>>> That said, I think we can consolidate the OVB jobs in 2:
>>>
>>> - keep ovb-ha and containerize it in Queens and beyond: it was already
>>> approved and change is being applied now:
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522293/
>>>   indeed, we decided as a community that we would stop supporting
>>> non-containerized overclouds in Queens and beyond.
>>> - remove ovb-containers in Queens and beyond: useless now, since we
>>> have ovb-ha containerized: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522579/
>>> - Remove ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024 and create ovb-ha-ipv6:
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522618/
>>>   indeed, ceph is already well tested in scenarios, ipv6 would be
>>> tested in ovb-ha-ipv6.
>>>   for overcloud updates, I haven't seen the feature in quickstart but
>>> I might have missed something (any help here is welcome).
>>>
>>> At the end, we should end up with 2 OVB jobs:
>>> - ovb-ha (could be renamed in ovb-ha-ipv4 if that helps)
>>> - ovb-ha-ipv6
>>>
>>> Both would test the things that can't be tested by multinode:
>>> - Nova / Ironic / Mistral workflow
>>> - Introspection
>>> - TLS
>>> - Network Isolation
>>> - IPv6 for the ovb-ha-ipv6
>>> - Containerized overcloud
>>>
>>> As a result, we have more coverage (except for stack updates but it
>>> needs to be addressed in quickstart first) and less jobs, so less
>>> resources consumed.
>>>
>>> Any feedback on this plan is more than welcome,
>>> --
>>> Emilien Macchi
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Emilien Macchi
>
>
>
> --
> Emilien Macchi



-- 
Emilien Macchi