Open Stack

So far in my testing I found 2 issues:

- IPv6 + TLS doesn't work in tripleo-ci, certificates aren't good
(expected). We might need to generate new ones, I'll take a look
myself probably.
  http://logs.openstack.org/18/522618/2/check-tripleo/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha-oooq-ipv6/d21046c/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/overcloud_deploy_post.log.txt.gz#_2017-11-23_20_59_28

- Running Tempest on OVB jobs with TLS doesn't work for me yet:
  http://logs.openstack.org/10/522310/6/check-tripleo/tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha-oooq/ad6c2c1/logs/undercloud/home/zuul/tempest_output.log.txt.gz#_2017-11-23_21_03_57
  Any help on that one is welcome

Thanks,

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:37 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
> I forgot to add an ongoing effort to reduce number of services
> deployed on ovb jobs at a strict minimum:
> https://review.openstack.org/522310
> So we hope to run the job faster and more efficiently. Our scenarios
> already cover services like Cinder, Heat and Swift. We don't need them
> anymore on OVB.
>
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:59 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Queens's main theme is stabilization.
>> That's what we're currently working on in our CI, see which areas we
>> can consolidate and stabilize so we can continue to scale TripleO
>> development.
>>
>> One of the challenges that we had in the last years was the high
>> demand of OVB jobs versus the capacity.
>> To address that, we recently decided to remove ovb-nonha. It was a good start.
>>
>> Now we have:
>> - ovb-ha which test introspection, Pacemaker, TLS, net-iso (multi-nics)
>> - ovb-containers which tested a containerized overcloud
>> - ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024: which was renamed from
>> ovb-updates and is supposed to test ipv6 overcloud, stack updates &
>> ceph. It doesn't test stack updates (since the switch to
>> tripleo-quickstart), and Ceph is already extensively tested in
>> multinode scenario001/004 jobs.
>>
>> That said, I think we can consolidate the OVB jobs in 2:
>>
>> - keep ovb-ha and containerize it in Queens and beyond: it was already
>> approved and change is being applied now:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522293/
>>   indeed, we decided as a community that we would stop supporting
>> non-containerized overclouds in Queens and beyond.
>> - remove ovb-containers in Queens and beyond: useless now, since we
>> have ovb-ha containerized: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522579/
>> - Remove ovb-1ctlr_1comp_1ceph-featureset024 and create ovb-ha-ipv6:
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522618/
>>   indeed, ceph is already well tested in scenarios, ipv6 would be
>> tested in ovb-ha-ipv6.
>>   for overcloud updates, I haven't seen the feature in quickstart but
>> I might have missed something (any help here is welcome).
>>
>> At the end, we should end up with 2 OVB jobs:
>> - ovb-ha (could be renamed in ovb-ha-ipv4 if that helps)
>> - ovb-ha-ipv6
>>
>> Both would test the things that can't be tested by multinode:
>> - Nova / Ironic / Mistral workflow
>> - Introspection
>> - TLS
>> - Network Isolation
>> - IPv6 for the ovb-ha-ipv6
>> - Containerized overcloud
>>
>> As a result, we have more coverage (except for stack updates but it
>> needs to be addressed in quickstart first) and less jobs, so less
>> resources consumed.
>>
>> Any feedback on this plan is more than welcome,
>> --
>> Emilien Macchi
>
>
>
> --
> Emilien Macchi



-- 
Emilien Macchi