Open Stack

On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:42:32PM -0500, Ben Nemec wrote:
> 
> 
> On 03/13/2017 02:29 PM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
> > Hi, all
> > 
> > I submitted a change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443964/
> > but seems like it reached a point which requires an additional discussion.
> > 
> > I had a few proposals, it's increasing period to 12 hours instead of 4
> > for start, and to leave it in regular periodic *low* precedence.
> > I think we can start from 12 hours period to see how it goes, although I
> > don't think that 4 only jobs will increase load on OVB cloud, it's
> > completely negligible comparing to current OVB capacity and load.
> > But making its precedence as "low" IMHO completely removes any sense
> > from this pipeline to be, because we already run experimental-tripleo
> > pipeline which this priority and it could reach timeouts like 7-14
> > hours. So let's assume we ran periodic job, it's queued to run now 12 +
> > "low queue length" - about 20 and more hours. It's even worse than usual
> > periodic job and definitely makes this change useless.
> > I'd like to notice as well that those periodic jobs unlike "usual"
> > periodic are used for repository promotion and their value are equal or
> > higher than check jobs, so it needs to run with "normal" or even "high"
> > precedence.
> 
> Yeah, it makes no sense from an OVB perspective to add these as low priority
> jobs.  Once in a while we've managed to chew through the entire experimental
> queue during the day, but with the containers job added it's very unlikely
> that's going to happen anymore.  Right now we have a 4.5 hour wait time just
> for the check queue, then there's two hours of experimental jobs queued up
> behind that.  All of which means if we started a low priority periodic job
> right now it probably wouldn't run until about midnight my time, which I
> think is when the regular periodic jobs run now.
> 
Lets just give it a try? A 12 hour periodic job with low priority. There is
nothing saying we cannot iterate on this after a few days / weeks / months.

> > 
> > Thanks
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayutin at redhat.com
> > <mailto:whayutin at redhat.com>> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >     On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org
> >     <mailto:fungi at yuggoth.org>> wrote:
> > 
> >         On 2017-03-07 10:12:58 -0500 (-0500), Wesley Hayutin wrote:
> >         > The TripleO team would like to initiate a conversation about the
> >         > possibility of creating a new pipeline in Openstack Infra to allow
> >         > a set of jobs to run periodically every four hours
> >         [...]
> > 
> >         The request doesn't strike me as contentious/controversial. Why not
> >         just propose your addition to the zuul/layout.yaml file in the
> >         openstack-infra/project-config repo and hash out any resulting
> >         concerns via code review?
> >         --
> >         Jeremy Stanley
> > 
> > 
> >     Sounds good to me.
> >     We thought it would be nice to walk through it in an email first :)
> > 
> >     Thanks
> > 
> > 
> >         __________________________________________________________________________
> >         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >         Unsubscribe:
> >         OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >         <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> >         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >     __________________________________________________________________________
> >     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >     Unsubscribe:
> >     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
> >     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >     <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > Best regards
> > Sagi Shnaidman
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev