Open Stack

On 03/13/2017 02:29 PM, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
> Hi, all
>
> I submitted a change: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/443964/
> but seems like it reached a point which requires an additional discussion.
>
> I had a few proposals, it's increasing period to 12 hours instead of 4
> for start, and to leave it in regular periodic *low* precedence.
> I think we can start from 12 hours period to see how it goes, although I
> don't think that 4 only jobs will increase load on OVB cloud, it's
> completely negligible comparing to current OVB capacity and load.
> But making its precedence as "low" IMHO completely removes any sense
> from this pipeline to be, because we already run experimental-tripleo
> pipeline which this priority and it could reach timeouts like 7-14
> hours. So let's assume we ran periodic job, it's queued to run now 12 +
> "low queue length" - about 20 and more hours. It's even worse than usual
> periodic job and definitely makes this change useless.
> I'd like to notice as well that those periodic jobs unlike "usual"
> periodic are used for repository promotion and their value are equal or
> higher than check jobs, so it needs to run with "normal" or even "high"
> precedence.

Yeah, it makes no sense from an OVB perspective to add these as low 
priority jobs.  Once in a while we've managed to chew through the entire 
experimental queue during the day, but with the containers job added 
it's very unlikely that's going to happen anymore.  Right now we have a 
4.5 hour wait time just for the check queue, then there's two hours of 
experimental jobs queued up behind that.  All of which means if we 
started a low priority periodic job right now it probably wouldn't run 
until about midnight my time, which I think is when the regular periodic 
jobs run now.

>
> Thanks
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 10:06 PM, Wesley Hayutin <whayutin at redhat.com
> <mailto:whayutin at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
>     On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org
>     <mailto:fungi at yuggoth.org>> wrote:
>
>         On 2017-03-07 10:12:58 -0500 (-0500), Wesley Hayutin wrote:
>         > The TripleO team would like to initiate a conversation about the
>         > possibility of creating a new pipeline in Openstack Infra to allow
>         > a set of jobs to run periodically every four hours
>         [...]
>
>         The request doesn't strike me as contentious/controversial. Why not
>         just propose your addition to the zuul/layout.yaml file in the
>         openstack-infra/project-config repo and hash out any resulting
>         concerns via code review?
>         --
>         Jeremy Stanley
>
>
>     Sounds good to me.
>     We thought it would be nice to walk through it in an email first :)
>
>     Thanks
>
>
>         __________________________________________________________________________
>         OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>         Unsubscribe:
>         OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>         <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>
>
>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Sagi Shnaidman
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>