[openstack-dev] [all][qa][glance] some recent tempest problems

Eric Harney eharney at redhat.com
Fri Jun 16 14:46:55 UTC 2017


On 06/16/2017 10:21 AM, Sean McGinnis wrote:
> 
> I don't think merging tests that are showing failures, then blacklisting
> them, is the right approach. And as Eric points out, this isn't
> necessarily just a failure with Ceph. There is a legitimate logical
> issue with what this particular test is doing.
> 
> But in general, to get back to some of the earlier points, I don't think
> we should be merging tests with known breakages until those breakages
> can be first addressed.
> 

As another example, this was the last round of this, in May:

https://review.openstack.org/#/c/332670/

which is a new tempest test for a Cinder API that is not supported by
all drivers.  The Ceph job failed on the tempest patch, correctly, the
test was merged, then the Ceph jobs broke:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/glance/+bug/1687538
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/461625/

This is really not a sustainable model.

And this is the _easy_ case, since Ceph jobs run in OpenStack infra and
are easily visible and trackable.  I'm not sure what the impact is on
Cinder third-party CI for other drivers.



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list