Open Stack

On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 1:01 PM, gordon chung <gord at live.ca> wrote:
>
>
> On 15/06/17 11:28 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
>> The purpose (my 2 cents) is to highlight what projects are under
>> governance and those that are not.
>
> going down the rabbit hole, what does it mean to be under governance?
> projects that want to use the openstack brand and were, at the time of
> acceptance, supported some subset[1] of: 'open',
[DIMS] Yes,
> had some testing,
[DIMS] Yes
> supported keystone,
[DIMS] No. It was never mandatory
had a human resource?
[DIMS] Yes, hopefully a bunch of people work on it
 i don't really see how this
> differs from big tent?
[DIMS] Tons of folks confused about "Big-Tent", folks are confusing
that label with "projects under governance".
seems more like the same but without the
> 'big-tent' stigma?
[DIMS] Not sure about stigma. The label is useless right now.



>
> are we hoping openstack foundation to be a cloud-specific apache
> foundation? maybe it already is, and if so, i don't really understand
> the additional labeling we're trying to achieve.
>
> [1]
> https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/new-projects-requirements.html
>
> --
> gord
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims