[openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" terminology

gordon chung gord at live.ca
Thu Jun 15 17:01:31 UTC 2017

On 15/06/17 11:28 AM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> The purpose (my 2 cents) is to highlight what projects are under
> governance and those that are not.

going down the rabbit hole, what does it mean to be under governance? 
projects that want to use the openstack brand and were, at the time of 
acceptance, supported some subset[1] of: 'open', had some testing, 
supported keystone, had a human resource? i don't really see how this 
differs from big tent? seems more like the same but without the 
'big-tent' stigma?

are we hoping openstack foundation to be a cloud-specific apache 
foundation? maybe it already is, and if so, i don't really understand 
the additional labeling we're trying to achieve.



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list