[openstack-dev] Is Routes==2.3.1 a binary only package or something?
Michael Still
mikal at stillhq.com
Mon Jun 12 08:29:29 UTC 2017
Hi,
I'm trying to explain this behaviour in stable/newton, which specifies
Routes==2.3.1 in upper-constraints:
$ pip install --no-binary :all: Routes==2.3.1
...
Could not find a version that satisfies the requirement Routes==2.3.1
(from versions: 1.5, 1.5.1, 1.5.2, 1.6, 1.6.1, 1.6.2, 1.6.3, 1.7, 1.7.1,
1.7.2, 1.7.3, 1.8, 1.9, 1.9.1, 1.9.2, 1.10, 1.10.1, 1.10.2, 1.10.3, 1.11,
1.12, 1.12.1, 1.12.3, 1.13, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.4.1)
Cleaning up...
No matching distribution found for Routes==2.3.1
There is definitely a 2.3.1 on pip:
$ pip install Routes==2.3.1
...
Successfully installed Routes-2.3.1 repoze.lru-0.6 six-1.10.0
This implies to me that perhaps Routes version 2.3.1 is a binary-only
release and that stable/newton is therefore broken for people who don't
like binary packages (in my case because they're building an install image
for an architecture which doesn't match their host architecture).
Am I confused? I'd love to be enlightened.
Michael
--
Rackspace Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170612/dc9879d1/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list