[openstack-dev] [nova][searchlight] status of an instance on the REST API and in the instance notifications
Balazs Gibizer
balazs.gibizer at ericsson.com
Wed Jul 19 15:54:46 UTC 2017
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 5:38 PM, McLellan, Steven
<steve.mclellan at hpe.com> wrote:
> Thanks Balazs for noticing and replying to my message!
>
> The Status field is quite important to us since it's the indicator of
> VM state that Horizon displays most prominently and the most simple
> description of whether a VM is currently usable or not without having
> to parse the various _state fields. If we can't get this change added
> in Pike I'll probably implement a simplified version of the mapping
> in [2], but it would be really good to get it into the notifications
> in Pike if possible. I understand though that this late in the cycle
> it may not be possible.
I can create a patch to add the status to the instance notifications
but I don't know if nova cores accept it for this late in Pike.
@Cores: Do you?
Cheers,
gibi
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve
>
> On 7/19/17, 10:27 AM, "Balazs Gibizer" <balazs.gibizer at ericsson.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Steve asked the following question on IRC [1]
>
> < sjmc7> hi gibi. sorry, meant to bring this up in the
> notifications
> meeting but i had to step away for a bit. we were having a
> discussion
> last week about the field that the API returns as 'status' - do
> the
> notifications have an equivalent?
>
> I will try to answer it here so others can chime in.
>
> Internally in nova an instance has vm_state, task_state and
> power_state. On the REST API the instance has status which is
> calculated from vm_state and task_state. See the code doing the
> conversion here [2]. The instance notifications contain both the
> vm_state, task_state and power_state of the instance but do not
> contain
> the calculated status value [3]. The instance.update notification
> has
> extra state fields to signal possible state transitions [4].
>
> Technically we can add the calculated status field to the
> notifications
> but it is not there at the moment. So if searchlight needs that
> info
> right now then it needs to be calculated on searchlight side
> based on
> the vm_state and the task_state from the notification.
>
> Adding this field can be a continuation of the bp
> additional-notification-fields-for-searchlight [5] in Queens.
>
>
> Cheers,
> gibi
>
> [1]
>
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-nova/%23openstack-nova.2017-07-18.log.html#t2017-07-18T17:39:36
> [2]
>
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/a4a9733f4a9ead01356f0f76c1bb1f04f905fa4e/nova/api/openstack/common.py#L113
> [3]
>
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/2e4417d57cb6f74664c5746b43db9a96797f33e9/nova/notifications/objects/instance.py#L52-L54
> [4]
>
> https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/2e4417d57cb6f74664c5746b43db9a96797f33e9/nova/notifications/objects/instance.py#L352
> [5]
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/additional-notification-fields-for-searchlight
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list