[openstack-dev] [tripleo] scenario006 conflict

Flavio Percoco flavio at redhat.com
Thu Jul 13 06:17:40 UTC 2017

On 12/07/17 14:23 -0700, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>Hey folks,
>Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006
>(https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it
>would work with multinode jobs.
>Also, Flavio would like to test k8s on scenario006:
>https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471759/ . To avoid having too much
>scenarios and complexity, I think if ironic tests can be done on a
>2nodes job, then we can deploy ironic on scenario004 maybe. If not,
>then please give the requirements so we can see how to structure it.
>For Flavio's need, I think we need a dedicated scenario for now, since
>he's not going to deploy any OpenStack service on the overcloud for
>now, just k8s.

True, this is the plan for now. However, I don't think deploying other services
in the overcloud is going to affect what I'm doing now.

Ultimately, I'll start moving the services onto Kubernetes as soon as the rest
of the work starts to shape out.

Thanks for the email,

Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 862 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170713/12dbcc51/attachment.sig>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list