Open Stack

On 17 July 2017 at 15:56, Derek Higgins <derekh at redhat.com> wrote:
> On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins <derekh at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi <emilien at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006
>>>>>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it
>>>>>> would work with multinode jobs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Derek, I also would like to point out that
>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802 is missing the environment
>>>>> file for non-containerized deployments & and also the pingtest file.
>>>>> Just for the record, if we can have it before the job moves in gate.
>>>>
>>>> I knew I had left out the ping test file, this is the next step but I
>>>> can create a noop one for now if you'd like?
>>>
>>> Please create a basic pingtest with common things we have in other scenarios.
>>>
>>>> Is the non-containerized deployments a requirement?
>>>
>>> Until we stop supporting non-containerized deployments, I would say yes.
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> --
>>>>> Emilien Macchi
>>>
>>> So if you create a libvirt domain, would it be possible to do it on
>>> scenario004 for example and keep coverage for other services that are
>>> already on scenario004? It would avoid to consume a scenario just for
>>> Ironic. If not possible, then talk with Flavio and one of you will
>>> have to prepare scenario007 or 0008, depending where Numans is in his
>>> progress to have OVN coverage as well.
>>
>> I haven't seen much resolution / answers about it. We still have the
>> conflict right now and open questions.
>>
>> Derek, Flavio - let's solve this one this week if we can.
> Yes, I'll be looking into using scenario004 this week. I was traveling
> last week so wasn't looking at it.

I'm not sure if this is what you had intended but I believe to do
this(i.e. test the nova ironic driver) we we'll
need to swap out the nova libvirt driver for the ironic one. I think
this is ok as the libvirt driver has coverage
in other scenarios.

Because there are no virtual BMC's setup yet on the controller I also
have to remove the instance creation,
but if merged I'll next work on adding these now. So I'm think
something like this
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485261/

>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Emilien Macchi