Open Stack

Hi Gordon,

Thanks for the explanations!

Br,
György

> -----Original Message-----
> From: gordon chung [mailto:gord at live.ca]
> Sent: 2017 július 4, kedd 23:58
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [ceilometer]Understandig ceilometer
> 
> 
> 
> On 04/07/17 05:14 AM, Gyorgy Szombathelyi wrote:
> > - I understand that there is no collector service now. I know the old pipeline
> was: compute-agent->notification-agent->collector->storage(gnocchi).
> > Now I assumed it should be compute-agent->storage(gnocchi).
> > However I found out it is a bit different: compute-agent->notification-
> agent->storage. Is it the intended behavior or just a configuration error on
> my side?
> >
> 
> there is no storage service now. ceilometer is just collection.
> 
> compute-agent->notification-agent->gnocchi is correct. there is no way
> to publish directly from polling agents to storage currently (not without
> hacking). i'm personally not against having polling agent push to gnocchi
> directory but it's just not there currently.
> 
> > - I found no gnocchi at the publishers, but it is still there at the
> > dispatchers. How is it used as a publisher? Just with some magic
> transformation, publishers: -gnocchi:// is translated into using the direct
> publisher?
> >
> 
> we haven't ported over gnocchi to publisher. it's still a dispatcher with a
> publisher alias. there is a work item for this and it's pretty simple, we just
> didn't do it (yet). i would think it will be done in Pike since we ideally want to
> remove all dispatchers in Queen.
> 
> cheers,
> 
> --
> gord
> __________________________________________________________
> ________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-
> request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev