[openstack-dev] [nova] How to use resource_providers for shared disk resources (NFS)

Shewale, Bhagyashri Bhagyashri.Shewale at nttdata.com
Tue Jan 31 06:25:18 UTC 2017


Hi Jay,

Thank you for information. :)

Thank you,

Bhagyashri

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Pipes [mailto:jaypipes at gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, January 30, 2017 11:31 PM
To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [nova] How to use resource_providers for shared disk resources (NFS)

On 01/30/2017 05:55 AM, Shewale, Bhagyashri wrote:
> Hi nova devs,
>
> How can I use placement api's if my instance path is mounted on shared 
> storage server (e.g. NFS)?
>
> I am trying to set multinode setup with NFS shared storage for all 
> nodes to share disk resources along with placement services. As of now 
> it is creating resource providers for each of the compute node and 
> adds the DISK_GB for each resource provider.

Correct. Well, I mean that this behaviour is expected (and is the identical behaviour that exists in Nova today with the non-placement API).

We have not yet merged code that handles the correct accounting of shared storage, unfortunately. :(

When we merge all the code that handles shared storage [1], you should be able to do something like the following:

STORAGE_UUID=`openstack aggregate-create "my NFS storage pool"` openstack aggregate-host-associated $STORAGE_UUID $UUID_COMPUTE1 openstack aggregate-host-associated $STORAGE_UUID $UUID_COMPUTE2

Add some inventory to the aggregate, like so:

PUT /resource_providers/$STORAGE_UUID/inventories
{
   "DISK_GB": {
     "total": 1000,
     "reserved": 0,
     "min_unit": 10,
     "max_unit": 1000,
     "allocation_ratio": 1.0
   }
}

and then the compute nodes will just "auto-heal" themselves, removing "local" DISK_GB inventories and using the DISK_GB inventory of the storage pool.

But, again, this code isn't yet merged.

We're making slow but steady progress, but I can't tell you when the code will fully land, unfortunately.

Best,
-jay

[1] Code that builds upon this patch: 
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/407309/

> For example below are my environment details:
>
> NODE A: compute
> NODE B: controller + compute
>
> Following entries are made in resource_providers table:
>
> +---------------------+---------------------+----+--------------------------------------+------------------------+------------+----------+
>
> | created_at          | updated_at          | id |
> uuid                                 | name                   |
> generation | can_host |
>
> +---------------------+---------------------+----+--------------------------------------+------------------------+------------+----------+
>
> | 2017-01-30 06:49:17 | 2017-01-30 09:12:06 |  1 |
> 6cbbaf2b-5b8c-4f38-8b34-ee23791056a6 | openstack-VirtualBox   |
> 3 |        0 |
>
> | 2017-01-30 09:02:29 | 2017-01-30 09:11:03 |  3 |
> bad71c26-8f36-43ea-abf4-bdbeffda9e54 | openstack-VirtualBox-1 |
> 2 |        0 |
>
> +---------------------+---------------------+----+--------------------------------------+------------------------+------------+----------+
>
>
>
> Following are the entries of inventories tables, of which 89 indicates 
> the DISK_GB (size of shared storage):
>
>
>
> +---------------------+---------------------+----+----------------------+-------------------+-------+----------+----------+----------+-----------+------------------+
>
> | created_at          | updated_at          | id | resource_provider_id
> | resource_class_id | total | reserved | min_unit | max_unit | 
> | step_size allocation_ratio |
>
> +---------------------+---------------------+----+----------------------+-------------------+-------+----------+----------+----------+-----------+------------------+
>
> | 2017-01-30 06:49:19 | 2017-01-30 09:10:37 |  1 |                    1
> |                 0 |     1 |        0 |        1 |        1 |         1
> |               16 |
>
> | 2017-01-30 06:49:19 | 2017-01-30 09:10:37 |  2 |                    1
> |                 1 | 11210 |      512 |        1 |    11210 |         1
> |              1.5 |
>
> | 2017-01-30 06:49:19 | 2017-01-30 09:10:37 |  3 |                    1
> |                 2 |    89 |        0 |        1 |       89 |         1
> |                1 |
>
> | 2017-01-30 09:02:31 | 2017-01-30 09:11:03 |  7 |                    3
> |                 0 |     1 |        0 |        1 |        1 |         1
> |               16 |
>
> | 2017-01-30 09:02:31 | 2017-01-30 09:11:03 |  8 |                    3
> |                 1 | 10253 |      512 |        1 |    10253 |         1
> |              1.5 |
>
> | 2017-01-30 09:02:31 | 2017-01-30 09:11:03 |  9 |                    3
> |                 2 |    89 |        0 |        1 |       89 |         1
> |                1 |
>
> +---------------------+---------------------+----+----------------------+-------------------+-------+----------+----------+----------+-----------+------------------+
>
>
>
> However still I am able to create the instances over the size of 
> actual shared storage.
>
>
>
> Please let me know how to configure resource_providers in case of 
> shared storage servers are used for disk resources.
>
>
>
> Thank you,
>
>
>
> Bhagyashri
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest 
> confidence for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally 
> privileged, confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the 
> intended recipient, please advise the sender by replying promptly to 
> this email and then delete and destroy this email and any attachments 
> without any further use, copying or forwarding.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> ____ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: 
> OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

______________________________________________________________________
Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence
for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged,
confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient,
please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete
and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying
or forwarding.



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list