Open Stack

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Ian Cordasco <sigmavirus24 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi everyone,
>
> I've seen a few nascent projects wanting to implement their own secret
> storage to either replace Barbican or avoid adding a dependency on it.
> When I've pressed the developers on this point, the only answer I've
> received is to make the operator's lives simpler.
>
>
This is my opinion, but I'd like to see Keystone use Barbican for storing
credentials. It hasn't happened yet because nobody's had the time or
inclination (what we have works). If this happened, we could deprecate the
current way of storing credentials and require Barbican in a couple of
releases. Then Barbican would be a required service. The Barbican team
might find this to be the easiest route towards convincing other projects
to also use Barbican.

- Brant
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20170118/c135951f/attachment.html>