[openstack-dev] [nova] notification update week 15

Matt Riedemann mriedemos at gmail.com
Tue Apr 18 22:05:57 UTC 2017


On 4/18/2017 3:55 AM, Balazs Gibizer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the status update / focus setting mail about notification work
> for week 15.
>
> Bugs
> ----
> [Medium] https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1657428 The instance
> notifications are sent with inconsistent timestamp format. We need to
> iterate more on the solution I updated last week.
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/421981
>
>
> Versioned notification transformation
> -------------------------------------
> The volume_attach and detach notifications are still in focus to support
> Searchlight switching to the versioned notifications. Both are ready for
> core review:
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/401992/ Transform
> instance.volume_attach notification
> * https://review.openstack.org/#/c/408676/ Transform
> instance.volume_detach notification
>
>
> Searchlight integration
> -----------------------
> changing Searchlight to use versioned notifications
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/searchlight/+spec/nova-versioned-notifications
>
> bp is a hard dependency for the integration work.
>
> The path on Searchlight side https://review.openstack.org/#/c/453352/
> evolves
> gradually.

Cool, this is a pleasant surprise.

>
>
> bp additional-notification-fields-for-searchlight
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> Besides volume_attach and volume_detach we need the following patches to
> help Searchlight integration:
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+topic:bp/additional-notification-fields-for-searchlight
>
>
> The debate about adding the tags to the instance payload now seems to
> moving to the direction of adding the tags only to instance.create and
> instance.update. This means that the related patch needs to be reworked.

An update from the notifications meeting today, we agreed to just put 
instance.tags on the instance.update notifications for now. Kevin Zheng 
has a blueprint to tag an instance during create, and we'll add 
instance.tags to the instance.create notification as part of that change 
(including creating a new payload for the instance.create 
notifications). gibi is going to take over the patch to put 
instance.tags into the instance.update patch.

>
> The auto_disk_config patch only needs a second +2
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419185/

I left some comments on this one today, but my concern is mostly the 
same old story now about putting more fields in the base instance action 
payload that means it has to go into every instance action payload, but 
it's really only used in a few operations from what I can tell (create, 
resize, rebuild, and maybe a couple of others like rescue and unshelve - 
I suppose migrations too). I'm less concerned about that one though 
since it does not require lazy-loading fields on the instance object 
(like we had to do with instance.tags).

>
> The author of the keypairs patch
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419730/ Anusha told me that she was
> moved away from OpenStack so we need somebody to pick this patch up and
> rebase it.

I've asked Kevin Zheng to see if he can take over this one or any others 
in this blueprint series that need help now.

>
> We still need to work on the https://review.openstack.org/#/c/448779/
> (Add BDM to InstancePayload) path from testing point of view.
>
>
> Other items
> -----------
> No progress from last week, so see the last maill
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-April/115179.html for
> details.
>
> Weekly meeting
> --------------
> The notification subteam holds it's weekly meeting on Tuesday 17:00 UTC
> on openstack-meeting-4 so the next meeting will be held on 18th of
> April.
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?iso=20170418T170000
>
> Cheers,
> gibi
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


-- 

Thanks,

Matt



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list