Open Stack

We're more than happy with that outcome, and may have already started the
patch ;) https://review.openstack.org/#/c/370011/

On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Ihar Hrachyshka <ihrachys at redhat.com>
wrote:

> Steve Martinelli <s.martinelli at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> A bug was recently filed against keystone [1]. As of the Newton release we
>> depend on a class being public -- BaseAuthProtocol instead of
>> _BaseAuthProtocol [2]. Which was introduced in 4.1.0 [3].
>>
>> The current requirement for keystonemiddleware is:
>>   keystonemiddleware>=4.0.0,!=4.1.0,!=4.5.0
>>
>> Blocking 4.0.0 would logically make it:
>>   keystonemiddleware>=4.2.0,!=4.5.0
>>
>> I've pushed a patch to the requirements repo for this change [4]. I'd
>> like to know if blocking the lower value makes sense, I realize it's
>> advertised, but we're up to 4.9.0 now.
>>
>> Unfortunately, many projects depend on keystonemiddleware, but (luckily
>> ?) this should only be server side projects [5], most of which are going
>> through their RC period now.
>>
>
> I suggest instead keystone closes the gap on their side, by falling back
> to _BaseAuthProtocol class if public one is not present. No requirement
> updates, no delay in rc1, just some time for keystone folks to be aware
> that the private class in 4.0.+ series is to be considered kinda public for
> their own usage.
>
> Ihar
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160914/182bfed0/attachment.html>