Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 09:21:57AM -0500, Matthew Thode wrote: > >> Ya that makes sense, the patch can be altered to just block 4.13.1,2 >> (assuming 4.13.3 really does fix it) > > I feel like we've gotten ourselves (well at least I'm confused) about what > we're trying to achieve here. > > It seem to be the primary purpose is to get a release of oslo.db out that > works > for everyone both requirements consumers and non-consumers. > > That seems to be done by: > 1. Release oslo.db (4.13.3) > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/367482/ > 2. Bump upper-constraints to point to the new release > Generated once the review above merges > Once it is generated we can abandon: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/366298/ > 4. Update global-requirements to mark some oslo.db versions as bad > I'll update https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365565 RSN Agreed. Though I already have a patch for that: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/365565/ > 5. Re-Release library packages that get a new the restricted oslo.db > requirement. > > There is also another goal to unblock PyMysql 0.7.7 from > global-requirements > and upper-constraints.txt > > I don't see the need for this. If distros were shipping 0.7.7 then maybe > but > even then it's a risky change at this stage. Agreed, and I expressed the same sentiment in Matthew’s patches before. > > https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/dev-python/pymysql > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/devel:languages:python/python-PyMySQL > https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pymysql > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-PyMySQL > http://ftp.redhat.com/redhat/linux/enterprise/7Server/en/RHOS/SRPMS/python-PyMySQL-0.6.7-2.2.el7ost.src.rpm > > The only really compelling reason for unblocking 0.7.7 *now* would be > because > we can't do it after we branch[1] but if we leave it masked it just means > that > distro packagers will know to skip it. > > We should Abandon https://review.openstack.org/#/c/364541/ Agreed, except that I don’t suggest we should abandon it. If there is some interest in unblocking it, then just postpone it to when Ocata is open. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 455 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160909/374aae71/attachment.pgp>