Open Stack

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Andrew Maksimov <amaksimov at mirantis.com> wrote:
> +1
> This is a good proposal, I also think we should have single fuel-core group
> for all repos. In real life core reviewers won't set +2 or merge to repos
> with which they are not familiar with.
Actually one of the reasons why core groups were split was that it
happened a few times :)

>
> Regards,
> Andrey Maximov
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov
> <vkozhukalov at mirantis.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dear colleagues,
>>
>> I'd like to suggest to use common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects
>> instead of having separate independent 'by-project' core groups like
>> 'fuel-astute-core' or 'fuel-agent-core'.
>>
>> Pros:
>> 1) It will be easier to access core members (timezone and holiday
>> tolerance)
>> 2) It will be easier to manage single core group (promote new members,
>> remove not active members)
>>
>> Cons:
>> 1) Less of flexibility. Permissions will be the same for all core
>> reviewers in all Fuel projects.
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>> Vladimir Kozhukalov
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Łukasz Oleś