[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects

Bulat Gaifullin bgaifullin at mirantis.com
Tue Sep 6 06:35:43 UTC 2016


+1, I think it is good idea.

Regards,
Bulat Gaifullin
Mirantis Inc.



> On 05 Sep 2016, at 20:17, Maksim Malchuk <mmalchuk at mirantis.com> wrote:
> 
> I want to clarify my previous reply
> +1
> but the new fuel-core would be a small group of the cores who are fully involved in the whole Fuel project.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Alexey Stepanov <astepanov at mirantis.com <mailto:astepanov at mirantis.com>> wrote:
> -1
> This is seriously dangerous idea: core-reviewer in fuel-qa does not mean exact skills for +2/W on fuel-octane, for example. Sometimes, because of limited time, reviewer will press +W without understanding patch detail. In repo, which he knows, he can fix issue later by itself, but only of he really knows what he doing.
> 
> 
> пн, 5 сент. 2016 г., 19:14 Maksim Malchuk <mmalchuk at mirantis.com <mailto:mmalchuk at mirantis.com>>:
> -1
> My vision - we should have something like super-core group with a smaller number of the current core guys.
> This is because a lot of current core guys were switched to the other projects and already out of the scope.
> Such guys still can be cores in their former projects and can help sometimes, but only several guys can drive the Fuel.
> 
> P.S. we always can nominate new cores to the specific project individually if you don't like the super-core group idea.
> 
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Andrew Maksimov <amaksimov at mirantis.com <mailto:amaksimov at mirantis.com>> wrote:
> +1
> This is a good proposal, I also think we should have single fuel-core group for all repos. In real life core reviewers won't set +2 or merge to repos with which they are not familiar with. 
> 
> Regards,
> Andrey Maximov
> 
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 2:11 PM, Vladimir Kozhukalov <vkozhukalov at mirantis.com <mailto:vkozhukalov at mirantis.com>> wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> I'd like to suggest to use common fuel-core group for all Fuel projects instead of having separate independent 'by-project' core groups like 'fuel-astute-core' or 'fuel-agent-core'. 
> 
> Pros: 
> 1) It will be easier to access core members (timezone and holiday tolerance)
> 2) It will be easier to manage single core group (promote new members, remove not active members)
> 
> Cons:
> 1) Less of flexibility. Permissions will be the same for all core reviewers in all Fuel projects.
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> Vladimir Kozhukalov
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Maksim Malchuk,
> Senior DevOps Engineer,
> MOS: Product Engineering,
> Mirantis, Inc
>  <mailto:vgordon at mirantis.com>__________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Maksim Malchuk,
> Senior DevOps Engineer,
> MOS: Product Engineering,
> Mirantis, Inc
>  <mailto:vgordon at mirantis.com>__________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160906/ef87fc8d/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list