Open Stack

On 10/10/16, 6:01 AM, "Flavio Percoco" <flavio at redhat.com> wrote:

>Hey Brian,
>
>Thanks for sending the summary out. Top-posting since it's kinda
>unrelated to
>the list of topics below.
>
>Are the cycle priorities going to be documented as we did in Mitaka?
>
>https://github.com/openstack/glance-specs/tree/master/priorities
>
>I'd personally advice for this. It'd be better to have this in a place
>where
>other members of the community can easily go to.
>
>Flavio

Yes, I was planning on putting up a patch to glance-specs during the design
summit after we've had a chance to hash out the priorities in Barcelona.
In
addition to being available to the wider community, it will allow people
who
weren't able to attend the Summit (which includes, unfortunately, almost
the
entire Glance team) to have the opportunity to provide input on what we
discuss
at the Summit.

At this point, we already have three priorities carried over from Newton,
and
I just want to make sure we keep the momentum going.

cheers,
brian


>
>On 07/10/16 18:50 +0000, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>>I'd like to reiterate what we discussed during the "Core Awareness" topic
>>at yesterday's Glance weekly meeting for those who weren't able to attend
>>or read through the meeting logs yet.
>>
>>Three Ocata priorities have already been determined:
>>(1) image import refactor
>>(2) community images (including image 'visibility' enhancements)
>>(3) rolling upgrades, specifically the database strategy for
>>zero-downtime
>>upgrades
>>
>>There's a sub-team working on image import (weekly sync in
>>#openstack-glance at 14:00 UTC).
>>
>>Any cores not working on image import, please direct your attention to
>>community images:
>>- https://review.openstack.org/369110
>>
>>- https://review.openstack.org/366354
>>- https://review.openstack.org/379852
>>With timely reviews, we may be able to land this before the summit.
>>Additionally, it's important to have the code merged so for the sub-team
>>working on rolling upgrades, so they can demonstrate how the strategy
>>will
>>work on a real-life migration.
>>
>>As far as rolling upgrades reviews go, there are a lot of comments on the
>>database strategy spec, but not many of these are from Glance cores.  It
>>would be good to take a look to sanity check the strategy being proposed:
>>- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/331740/
>>Additionally, there's a patch for moving db migrations from
>>SQLAlchemy-migrate to Alembic:
>>- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/374278/
>>And a patch up to make the switch to Alembic:
>>- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/382958/
>>Please take the time to look these over.  If you have reservations about
>>the move to Alembic, now's the time to make them heard.
>>
>>So, those are the Glance priorities for the next two weeks.
>>
>>cheers,
>>brian
>>
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>_
>>OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>Unsubscribe: 
>>OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>-- 
>@flaper87
>Flavio Percoco