[openstack-dev] [nova] placement / resource providers ocata summit session recaps

Jay Pipes jaypipes at gmail.com
Fri Nov 11 20:23:53 UTC 2016

On 11/11/2016 03:19 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
> On 11/11/2016 12:28 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
>> Matt, thanks much for your excellent summary of the resource provider
>> sessions in Barcelona. A couple minor corrections noted below.
>> On 11/02/2016 01:54 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>>> - Custom resource classes
>>> The code for this is moving along and being reviewed. There will be
>>> namespaces on the standard resource classes that nova provides.
>> Note that the opposite is what was decided: there will be no namespace
>> on standard resource classes, but we will be using a CUSTOM_ string
>> prefix for any resource classes that are added via the REST API (i.e.
>> they are user-created "custom resource classes").
>> All other resource classes that exist now (or in the future) in the list
>> of standard resource classes will have no string prefix.
> OK, I was going off what we discussed on Friday at the summit, but I
> suspect that changed during code review. Let's make this clear in the spec.


>>> The resource tracker will create inventory/allocation records for the
>>> Ironic nodes. The Ironic inventory records will use the
>>> node.resource_class value as the custom resource class.
>> node.node_class attribute, but yes.
> Are you sure? Is it not this?
> https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/541947f9060b146d25f97025eda6ca69b1c87226/ironic/db/sqlalchemy/models.py#L121

Hmm, apologies, checking the API you are correct. Sorry about that.


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list