Open Stack

On 11/11/2016 12:28 PM, Jay Pipes wrote:
> Matt, thanks much for your excellent summary of the resource provider
> sessions in Barcelona. A couple minor corrections noted below.
>
> On 11/02/2016 01:54 PM, Matt Riedemann wrote:
>> - Custom resource classes
>>
>> The code for this is moving along and being reviewed. There will be
>> namespaces on the standard resource classes that nova provides.
>
> Note that the opposite is what was decided: there will be no namespace
> on standard resource classes, but we will be using a CUSTOM_ string
> prefix for any resource classes that are added via the REST API (i.e.
> they are user-created "custom resource classes").
>
> All other resource classes that exist now (or in the future) in the list
> of standard resource classes will have no string prefix.

OK, I was going off what we discussed on Friday at the summit, but I 
suspect that changed during code review. Let's make this clear in the spec.

>
>> The resource tracker will create inventory/allocation records for the
>> Ironic nodes. The Ironic inventory records will use the
>> node.resource_class value as the custom resource class.
>
> node.node_class attribute, but yes.

Are you sure? Is it not this?

https://github.com/openstack/ironic/blob/541947f9060b146d25f97025eda6ca69b1c87226/ironic/db/sqlalchemy/models.py#L121

>
> Best,
> -jay
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>


-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann