Open Stack

Hi Jerico,

  we talked about it at Summit in one of the design sessions, but afaik
there is no blueprint or spec yet. I don't see why it can't happen in
Newton, however.

Best,

Trevor

On Thu, 2016-05-26 at 16:14 +1000, Jerico Revote wrote:
> Hi Trevor,
> 
> Just revisiting this,
> has there been any progress to deprecate sahara jobs -> internal db mechanism?
> and/or the config option to disable internal db storage?
>  
> Regards,
> 
> Jerico
> 
> 
> 
> > On 18 Mar 2016, at 12:55 AM, Trevor McKay <tmckay at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Jerico,
> > 
> >  Internal db storage for job binaries was added at
> > the start of EDP as an alternative for sites that do
> > not have swift running. Since then, we've also added
> > integration with manila so that job binaries can be
> > stored in manila shares.
> > 
> >  You are correct, storing lots of binaries in the
> > sahara db could make the database grow very large.
> > Swift or manila should be used for production, internal
> > storage is a good option for development/test.
> > 
> >  There is currently no way to disable internal storage.
> > We can took a look at adding such an option -- in fact
> > we have talked informally about the possibility of
> > deprecating internal db storage since swift and manila
> > are both mature at this point. We should discuss that
> > at the upcoming summit.
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Trevor
> > 
> > On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 10:27 +1100, Jerico Revote wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> When deploying Sahara, Sahara docos suggests to
> >> increase max_allowed_packet to 256MB,
> >> for internal database storing of job binaries.
> >> There could be hundreds of job binaries to be uploaded/created into
> >> Sahara,
> >> which would then cause the database to grow as well.
> >> Does anyone using Sahara encountered database sizing issues using
> >> internal db storage?
> >> 
> >> 
> >> It looks like swift is the more logical place for storing job
> >> binaries 
> >> (in our case we have a global swift cluster), and this is also
> >> available to the user.
> >> Is there a way to only enable the swift way for storing job binaries?
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Jerico
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> __________________________________________________________________________
> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev