Hi Liping Mao, On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:31 PM, Liping Mao (limao) <limao at cisco.com> wrote: > Hi Vikas, Antoni and Kuryr team, > > When I use kuryr, I notice kuryr will failed to add an existed > network with gateway interface already created by neutron[1][2]. > > The bug is because kuryr will create a neutron port for gw > port in ipam_request_address. > > I think kuryr should not do actual create neutron gw port at all. > Because CNM module do not have concept map with Neutron vRouter. > Till now, user have to use neutron api to attach GW port in > private network with vRouter. So I think the Kuryr should not > actually create GW port. > > I think it possible to define via kuryr configuration file if kuryr should create or not gw port. Kuryr already does it for DHCP port. > What do you think? Thanks for any comments. > > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/kuryr/+bug/1584286 > [2] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/319524/4 > > > > Regards， > Liping Mao > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160526/e6f725f5/attachment.html>