[openstack-dev] [all][tc] Languages vs. Scope of "OpenStack"

Julien Danjou julien at danjou.info
Wed May 25 08:01:55 UTC 2016

On Tue, May 24 2016, Fox, Kevin M wrote:

> For recent example, there has been a lot of talk about reimplementing features
> from Barbican in Magnum, Keystone, etc, and not wanting to depend on Barbican.
> In the pre-tent days, we'd just fix Barbican to do the things we all need it
> to, and then start depending on it. Then, everyone could start depending on a
> solid secret store being there since everyone would deploy it because they
> would want at least one thing that depends on it.

Sorry, but before Big Tent, it was impossible to have an integrated
project depending of a non-integrated project.

So what you're imagining was even less likely to happen.

Julien Danjou
-- Free Software hacker
-- https://julien.danjou.info
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 800 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160525/05b89bd5/attachment.pgp>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list