Open Stack

On 16:06 May 14, Nikhil Komawar wrote:
> On 5/14/16 2:35 PM, Mike Perez wrote:
> > Reading this thread, Nikhil who is speaking for the quota team is worried about
> > the amount of overhead caused by governance, instead of first focusing on
> > making something actually exist. I see quite a few people in this thread
> > speaking up that it should be part of the big tent either standalone or oslo
> > lib.
> >
> > I can't speak for the Oslo folks, but as a member of the TC here are the
> > requirements for the standalone route [1]. You would propose an agenda item to
> > the TC, and we would review that the project meets those requirements.
> > Considering the project does Open Design and has an Open Community - my guesses
> > on "probably would be followed" is Open Development and Open Source since we
> > don't have anything but a specification that exists to go off of.
> >
> > It sounds like the biggest hang up in going the oslo route is the oslo spec. So
> > question to the oslo folks, would you be interested in reviewing the
> > cross-project specification and allowing to be an oslo lib? That way the team
> > can focus on working on the library, and the community is happy it's part of
> > OpenStack already.
> >
> >
> >
> 
> Thanks Mike for helping us move forward.
> 
> After having been suggested yesterday, I have added this agenda item for
> the Oslo team meeting to get the answers
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Oslo#Agenda_for_Next_Meeting .
> 
> Also, can you please re-reference as the link did not come through?

[1] - http://governance.openstack.org/reference/new-projects-requirements.html

-- 
Mike Perez