Open Stack

Having read through the full thread I'm still in support of separate 
repos. I think the explanations Jeff Peeler and Adam Young have put 
forward summarise my thoughts very well.

One of the main arguments I seem to be hearing for a single repo is Git 
tooling which I don't think is a good one; we should do what's best for 
users and devs, not for tools.

Also as the guys pointed out, multiple repos are the most common pattern 
across OpenStack. I think it will help keep a better separation of 
concerns. Otherwise in my experience you start to get cross 
contamination of the projects, to the point where it becomes extremely 
difficult to pull them apart.

The images, ansible, and k8n need to be separate. The alternative is not 
scalable.

Thanks,
-Paul

On 03/05/16 00:39, Angus Salkeld wrote:
> On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 7:07 AM Steven Dake (stdake) <stdake at cisco.com
> <mailto:stdake at cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>     Ryan had rightly pointed out that when we made the original proposal
>     9am morning we had asked folks if they wanted to participate in a
>     separate repository.
>
>     I don't think a separate repository is the correct approach based
>     upon one off private conversations with folks at summit.  Many
>     people from that list approached me and indicated they would like to
>     see the work integrated in one repository as outlined in my vote
>     proposal email.  The reasons I heard were:
>
>       * Better integration of the community
>       * Better integration of the code base
>       * Doesn't present an us vs them mentality that one could argue
>         happened during kolla-mesos
>       * A second repository makes k8s a second class citizen deployment
>         architecture without a voice in the full deployment methodology
>       * Two gating methods versus one
>       * No going back to a unified repository while preserving git history
>
>     I favor of the separate repositories I heard
>
>       * It presents a unified workspace for kubernetes alone
>       * Packaging without ansible is simpler as the ansible directory
>         need not be deleted
>
>     There were other complaints but not many pros.  Unfortunately I
>     failed to communicate these complaints to the core team prior to the
>     vote, so now is the time for fixing that.
>
>     I'll leave it open to the new folks that want to do the work if they
>     want to work on an offshoot repository and open us up to the
>     possible problems above.
>
>
> +1 to the separate repo
>
> I think the separate repo worked very well for us and would encourage
> you to replicate that again. Having one repo doing one thing makes the
> goal of the repo obvious and makes the api between the images and
> deployment clearer (also the stablity of that
> api and things like permissions *cough* drop-root).
>
> -Angus
>
>
>     If you are on this list:
>
>       * Ryan Hallisey
>       * Britt Houser
>
>       * mark casey
>
>       * Steven Dake (delta-alpha-kilo-echo)
>
>       * Michael Schmidt
>
>       * Marian Schwarz
>
>       * Andrew Battye
>
>       * Kevin Fox (kfox1111)
>
>       * Sidharth Surana (ssurana)
>
>       *   Michal Rostecki (mrostecki)
>
>       *    Swapnil Kulkarni (coolsvap)
>
>       *    MD NADEEM (mail2nadeem92)
>
>       *    Vikram Hosakote (vhosakot)
>
>       *    Jeff Peeler (jpeeler)
>
>       *    Martin Andre (mandre)
>
>       *    Ian Main (Slower)
>
>       * Hui Kang (huikang)
>
>       * Serguei Bezverkhi (sbezverk)
>
>       * Alex Polvi (polvi)
>
>       * Rob Mason
>
>       * Alicja Kwasniewska
>
>       * sean mooney (sean-k-mooney)
>
>       * Keith Byrne (kbyrne)
>
>       * Zdenek Janda (xdeu)
>
>       * Brandon Jozsa (v1k0d3n)
>
>       * Rajath Agasthya (rajathagasthya)
>       * Jinay Vora
>       * Hui Kang
>       * Davanum Srinivas
>
>
>
>     Please speak up if you are in favor of a separate repository or a
>     unified repository.
>
>     The core reviewers will still take responsibility for determining if
>     we proceed on the action of implementing kubernetes in general.
>
>     Thank you
>     -steve
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>