[openstack-dev] [tc][fuel][kolla][osa][tripleo] proposing type:deployment
thierry at openstack.org
Wed Mar 23 11:01:48 UTC 2016
Steven Dake (stdake) wrote:
> Brain still booting this morning - 8am ftl. Thinking more clearly on this
> point, we could add a requirement that the software produce a functional
> out of the box working environment. This would easily apply to OSA and
> possibly even Puppet/Chef efforts.
> A stab at it would be:
> "After deployment is complete, the starter-kit:compute is fully
> operational without further interaction from the Operator."
> Open to language help in the review itself - I'll propose an update this
> morning. I'd like to be inclusive of projects like Puppet and Chef and
> obviously OSA which are clearly deployment systems which rely on
> deployment tools like Puppet, Chef, and Ansible respectively. This is the
> same model Kolla follows as well. Kolla Doesn't reinvent Ansible, we just
> use it.
> A type:packaging doesn't really fit though, because Kolla provides a
> completely working out of the box deployment whereas packaging (deb,
> docker, rpm) only package the software for other deployment tools to
Right, my point is that since the tag applies to specific deliverables,
I would apply the type:deployment to the thing that people must install
to produce a deployment -- that thing can then depend on other things
(libraries, packaging/recipes/playbooks), but what we need to
communicate to downstream users is where the entry point is.
I'll follow up on the review.
Thierry Carrez (ttx)
More information about the OpenStack-dev