Open Stack

My opition on this is that we have too many re-invented wheels in Fuel and it’s better think about replacing them with something we can re-use than re-inventing them one more time.

Let’s take a look at Ironic and try to figure out how we can use its features for the same purpose.


- romcheg
> 15 бер. 2016 р. о 10:38 Neil Jerram <Neil.Jerram at metaswitch.com> написав(ла):
> 
> On 15/03/16 07:11, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:
>> Alexander,
>> 
>> We have many other places where use Ruby (astute, puppet custom types,
>> etc.). I don't think it is a good reason to re-write something just
>> because it is written in Ruby. You are right about tests, about plugins,
>> but let's look around. Ironic community has already invented discovery
>> component (btw written in python) and I can't see any reason why we
>> should continue putting efforts in nailgun agent and not try to switch
>> to ironic-inspector.
> 
> +1 in general terms.  It's strange to me that there are so many
> OpenStack deployment systems that each do each piece of the puzzle in
> their own way (Fuel, Foreman, MAAS/Juju etc.) - and which also means
> that I need substantial separate learning in order to use all these
> systems.  It would be great to see some consolidation.
> 
> Regards,
> 	Neil
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 842 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160315/59012022/attachment.pgp>