[openstack-dev] [Fuel] Rewriting nailgun agent on Python proposal

Neil Jerram Neil.Jerram at metaswitch.com
Tue Mar 15 09:38:52 UTC 2016

On 15/03/16 07:11, Vladimir Kozhukalov wrote:
> Alexander,
> We have many other places where use Ruby (astute, puppet custom types,
> etc.). I don't think it is a good reason to re-write something just
> because it is written in Ruby. You are right about tests, about plugins,
> but let's look around. Ironic community has already invented discovery
> component (btw written in python) and I can't see any reason why we
> should continue putting efforts in nailgun agent and not try to switch
> to ironic-inspector.

+1 in general terms.  It's strange to me that there are so many 
OpenStack deployment systems that each do each piece of the puzzle in 
their own way (Fuel, Foreman, MAAS/Juju etc.) - and which also means 
that I need substantial separate learning in order to use all these 
systems.  It would be great to see some consolidation.


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list