[openstack-dev] [tc] Question about electorate for project without gerrit contribution

Tony Breeds tony at bakeyournoodle.com
Fri Mar 11 01:30:52 UTC 2016

On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 11:45:14PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote:

> The electorate rolls for project-teams without any
> deliverables/repos end up being limited to the "extra-atc" entries
> for them. For example, the I18N team has done an excellent job of
> providing a curated list of active translators, rendered at:
> http://governance.openstack.org/reference/projects/i18n.html#extra-atcs

Ah thank you for the clear and detailed reply.  We'll update the election
tooling to handle this case fro UX and I18N.
> I guess for teams with no deliverables *and* no extra ATCs, they
> probably also don't need a PTL?
> Packaging-Deb is the only one I see in an especially strange state
> at the moment: it has one existing repo (the rest are phantoms which
> were never created) with two Gerrit changes, both owned by the
> team's sole code contributor (based on our traditional process of
> enumerating Gerrit change owners)... Congratulations, Monty, on your
> new de facto PTL-ship!


Yours Tony.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160311/cfee93b8/attachment.pgp>

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list