[openstack-dev] [all] audience for release notes
doug at doughellmann.com
Tue Mar 1 19:34:16 UTC 2016
Excerpts from Robert Collins's message of 2016-03-02 07:14:19 +1300:
> There is a fixture in pbr's test suite to create keys with out entropy use,
> should be easy to adapt for user by Reno's tests.
That's likely where I got the original version of the one in reno now.
> On 1 Mar 2016 6:52 AM, "Thomas Goirand" <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
> > On 02/29/2016 10:31 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> > >>> Give this a try and see if it works any better:
> > >>> https://review.openstack.org/285812
> > >>
> > >> Oh, thanks so much! I'll try and give feedback on review.d.o. Is the
> > >> issue around the (missed) use of --debug-quick-random?
> > >>
> > >> Why do we need Reno unit tests to generate so many GPG keys btw, why not
> > >> just one or 2?
> > >
> > > As you've noticed, reno scans the history of a git repository to find
> > > release notes. It doesn't actually read any of the files from the work
> > > tree. So for tests, we need to create a little git repo and then tag
> > > commits to look like releases. We do that for a bunch of scenarios, and
> > > each test case generates a GPG key to use for signing the tags.
> > The patch works super well, and I uploaded a new version of the Debian
> > package with unit tests at build time.
> > However, the combined output of gnupg and testr is a bit ugly. Wouldn't
> > it be nicer to just generate a single GPG key, reused by multiple tests,
> > using a unit test fixture?
> > Cheers,
> > Thomas Goirand (zigo)
> > __________________________________________________________________________
> > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
More information about the OpenStack-dev