[openstack-dev] Version header for OpenStack microversion support
Steve Martinelli
s.martinelli at gmail.com
Sun Jun 19 03:58:47 UTC 2016
Recapping...
- ensure we are not using X- in the header
- use the service type, not name
For keystone it would be: OpenStack-API-Version: identity 3.7
For nova it would be: OpenStack-API-Version: compute 2.27
(which matches what is proposed here:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300077/14/api-guide/source/microversions.rst
)
Similarly for manila and ironic, I don't have the links handy, or the what
the headers are currently
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Ravi, Goutham <Goutham.Ravi at netapp.com>
wrote:
> True, manila is currently using the same header; but given that nova and
> ironic are supporting the new header recommendation, this has come up for
> discussion in the manila community.
>
>
>
> In any case, the use of the prefix “X-“, and project names within the
> header is not recommended. Please refer to the API Working Group’s
> recommendation in this regard:
>
>
>
>
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/microversion_specification.html
>
>
>
> The example already suggests what needs to be done in case of the identity
> project J
>
>
>
> --
>
> Goutham
>
>
>
> *From: *Steve Martinelli <s.martinelli at gmail.com>
> *Reply-To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
> questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> *Date: *Saturday, June 18, 2016 at 6:22 AM
> *To: *"OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [openstack-dev] Version header for OpenStack microversion
> support
>
>
>
> Looks like Manila is using the service name instead of type
> (X-OpenStack-Manila-API-Version) according to this link anyway:
> http://docs.openstack.org/developer/manila/devref/api_microversion_dev.html
>
> Keystone can follow the cross project spec and use the service type
> (Identity instead of Keystone).
>
> On Jun 17, 2016 12:44 PM, "Ed Leafe" <ed at leafe.com> wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2016, at 11:29 AM, Henry Nash <henrynash9 at mac.com> wrote:
>
> > We are currently in the process of implementing microversion support in
> keystone - and are obviously trying to follow the cross-projec spec for
> this (
> http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/api-wg/guidelines/microversion_specification.html
> ).
> >
> > One thing I noticed was that the header specified in this spec is of the
> form:
> >
> > OpenStack-API-Version: [SERVICE_TYPE] [X,Y]
> >
> > for example:
> >
> > OpenStack-API-Version: identity 3.7
> >
> > However, from what i can see of the current implementations I have seen
> of microversioning in OpenStack (Nova, Manilla), they use service-specific
> headers, e.g.
> >
> > X-OpenStack-Nova-API-Version: 2.12
> >
> > My question is whether there a plan to converge on the generalized
> header format….or are we keep with the service-specific headers? I’d
> obviously like to implement the correct one for keystone.
>
> Yes, the plan is to converge on the more generic headers. The Nova headers
> (don’t know about Manilla) pre-date the API WG spec, and were the
> motivation for development of that spec. We’ve even made it possible to
> accept both header formats [0] until things can be migrated to the
> recommended format.
>
> [0] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/300077/
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160618/de8d8808/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list