Open Stack

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Fox, Kevin M <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov> wrote:

[snip]

The issue is, as I see it, a parallel activity to one of the that is
> currently accepted into the Big Tent, aka Containerized Deployment


[snip]

This seems to be the crux of the matter as best as I can tell. Is it true
to say that the concern is that Kolla believes they "own" the containerized
deployment space inside the Big Tent?

Whether to have competing projects in the big tent was debated by the TC at
the time and my recollection is that we decided that was a good thing -- if
someone wanted to develop a Nova replacement, then let them do it in public
with the community. It would either win or lose based on its merits. Why is
this not something which can happen here as well?

I guess I should also point out that there is at least one other big tent
deployment tool deploying containerized openstack components now, so its
not like this idea is unique or new. Perhaps using kubernetes makes it
different somehow, but I don't see it.

Michael




-- 
Rackspace Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160727/28d7f994/attachment.html>