Open Stack

On 02/22/2016 06:49 PM, Matt Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 11:51 AM, Tim Bell <Tim.Bell at cern.ch> wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 22/02/16 17:27, "John Garbutt" <john at johngarbutt.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 22 February 2016 at 15:31, Monty Taylor <mordred at inaugust.com> wrote:
>>>> On 02/22/2016 07:24 AM, Russell Bryant wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Thierry Carrez <
>> thierry at openstack.org
>>>>>> <mailto:thierry at openstack.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>     Hi everyone,
>>>>>>     TL;DR: Let's split the events, starting after Barcelona.
>>>>> This proposal sounds fantastic.  Thank you very much to those that help
>>>>> put it together.
>>>> Totally agree. I think it's an excellent way to address the concerns and
>>>> balance all of the diverse needs we have.
>>>
>>> tl;dr
>>> +1
>>> Awesome work ttx.
>>> Thank you!
>>>
>>> Cheaper cities & venues should make it easier for more contributors to
>>> attend. Thats a big deal. This also feels like enough notice to plan
>>> for that.
>>>
>>> I think this means summit talk proposal deadline is both after the
>>> previous release, and after the contributor event for the next
>>> release? That should help keep proposals concrete (less guess work
>>> when submitting). Nice.
>>>
>>> Dev wise, it seems equally good timing. Initially I was worried about
>>> the event distracting from RC bugs, but actually I can see this
>>> helping.
>>>
>>> I am sure there are more questions that will pop up. Like I assume
>>> this means there is no ATC free pass to the summit? And I guess a
>>> small nominal fee for the contributor meetup (like the recent ops
>>> meetup, to help predict numbers of accurately)? I guess that helps
>>> level the playing field for contributors who don't put git commits in
>>> the repo (I am thinking vocal operators that don't contribute code).
>>> But I probably shouldn't go into all that just yet.
>>
>> I would like to find a way to allow contributors cheaper access to the
>> summits. Many of the devOPS contributors are patching test cases,
>> configuration management recipes and documentation which should be rewarded
>> in some form.
>>
>> Assuming that many of the ATCs are not so motivated to attend the summit,
>> the cost in offering access to the event would not be significant.
>>
>> Charging for the Ops meetups was, to my understanding, more to confirm
>> commitment to attend given limited space.
>>
>> Thus, I would be in favour of a preferential rate for contributors
>> (whether ATC is the right criteria is a different question) for summits.
>>
>>
>> Tim
> 
> 
> I believe this is already the case. Unless I'm mistaken contributing to a
> big tent config management project like the openstack puppet modules or
> chef counts for ATC. I'm not sure if osad is big tent but if so it would
> also count. Test cases and Docs also already count.

Contributions to any project listed in this file counts toward ATC
status:
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/projects.yaml

Thank you,
Anita.

> 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>