Open Stack

On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Nikhil Komawar <nik.komawar at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Here are a few ideas that I've in mind (more than 6 for now) for the
> workroom sessions (of course that can be prioritized):
>
> 1. Import refactor
> 2. Glare
> 3. Quotas
> 4. State of Image sharing, community images, Hierarchical Images etc.
> 5. glance_store improvements, general gate jobs discussions, releases
> discussions, logging, notification etc.
> 6. First hand & closed loop dedicated operator, superuser, general user,
> experience, etc. feedback
> 7. Feedback into the team from other projects, cross projects, general
> workflow, etc. changes
> 8. Priorities discussions
>

Thing is that most of what's going to be discussed is dictated by the
priorities themselves. We have a rough idea of what the priorities for
Newton are.

I think the list you provided is good but it still doesn't seem to require
an extra workroom for us (considering we have 3 fishbowl sessions too).

Flavio

>
> I think we can utilize the contributors meetup for some of them but all of
> them potentially involve folks who may not necessarily be first level
> contributors to Glance or at all (in case they want to attend other
> meetup). Also, asking for 8 (or more than 6) would be ill effect against
> being good openstack citizens.
>
>
> On 2/24/16 12:25 PM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Nikhil Komawar < <nik.komawar at gmail.com>
> nik.komawar at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we make it ? :
>>
>> FB 3
>> W 6
>> C 2
>>
>>
>
> Could you elaborate on why you think we need 6 workroom sessions?
>
> Back in Tokyo, 5 seemed more than enough and there will be more projects
> to host in Austin.
>
> Cheers,
> Flavio
>
>
>>
>> On 2/24/16 10:42 AM, Flavio Percoco wrote:
>>
>> Hey Folks,
>>
>> It's that time of the year. We need to choose what our needs with regards
>> to slots and sessions are for the next summit.
>>
>> We can choose among 3 different types of sessions:
>>
>> * Fishbowl slots (Wed-Thu)
>> Our traditional largish rooms organized in fishbowl style, with
>> advertised session content on the summit schedule for increased external
>> participation. Ideal for when wider feedback is essential.
>>
>> * Workroom slots (Tue-Thu)
>> Smaller rooms organized in boardroom style, with topic buried in the
>> session description, in an effort to limit attendance and not overcrowd
>> the room. Ideal to get work done and prioritize work in small teams.
>>
>> * Contributors meetup (Fri)
>> Half-day session(s) on the Friday to get into the Newton action while
>> decisions and plans are still hot, or to finish discussions started
>> during the week, whatever works for you.
>>
>> Our usage in Tokyo was: 3, 5, 2
>>
>> I'd recommend we keep it that way. Thoughts?
>> Cheers,
>> Flavio
>>
>> --
>> @flaper87
>> Flavio Percoco
>>
>>
>>
>> __________________________________________________________________________
>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribehttp://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Nikhil
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> @flaper87
> Flavio Percoco
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
> Nikhil
>
>


-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160225/36b3fa95/attachment.html>