Open Stack

On 22 February 2016 at 06:40, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:

>
> I'd vote for the extra round trip and implementation of caching whenever
> possible. Using another endpoint is really annoying, I already have
> specific stuff for cinder to setup both v1 and v2 endpoint, as v2
> doesn't fully implements what's in v1. BTW, where are we with this? Can
> I fully get rid of the v1 endpoint, or will I still experience some
> Tempest failures?
>


Can you detail what isn't in V2 that is in V1 please? I'm not aware of
anything, and I'd consider anything missing to be a serious bug

-- 
Duncan Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160222/aeeaef6e/attachment.html>