[openstack-dev] [all] [tc] "No Open Core" in 2016
thingee at gmail.com
Sat Feb 20 01:12:15 UTC 2016
On 02/17/2016 06:30 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> Excerpts from Mike Perez's message of 2016-02-17 03:21:51 -0800:
>> On 02/16/2016 11:30 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>> So I think the project team is doing everything we've asked. We
>>> changed our policies around new projects to emphasize the social
>>> aspects of projects, and community interactions. Telling a bunch
>>> of folks that they "are not OpenStack" even though they follow those
>>> policies is rather distressing. I think we should be looking for
>>> ways to say "yes" to new projects, rather than "no."
>> My disagreements with accepting Poppy has been around testing, so let me
>> reiterate what I've already said in this thread.
>> The governance currently states that under Open Development "The project
>> has core reviewers and adopts a test-driven gate in the OpenStack
>> infrastructure for changes" .
>> If we don't have a solution like OpenCDN, Poppy has to adopt a reference
>> implementation that is a commercial entity, and infra has to also be
>> dependent on it. I get Infra is already dependent on public cloud
>> donations, but if we start opening the door to allow projects to bring
>> in those commercial dependencies, that's not good.
> Only Poppy's test suite would rely on that, though, right? And other
> projects can choose whether to co-gate with Poppy or not. So I don't see
> how this limitation has an effect on anyone other than the Poppy team.
I maybe reading the words to closely, so someone please correct me, but
"adopts a test-driven gate in the OpenStack infrastructure for changes"
seems to imply that it would be *in the OpenStack infrastructure*, which
is exactly the problem I'm outlining here.
Read my earlier quote above about commercial dependencies in our
infrastructure and that being bad.
More information about the OpenStack-dev