Open Stack

On 02/09/2016 08:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> TripleO is currently using puppet-pacemaker [1] which is a module hosted
> & managed by Github.
> The module was created and mainly maintained by Redhat. It tends to
> break TripleO quite often since we don't have any gate.
> 
> I propose to move the module to OpenStack so we'll use OpenStack Infra
> benefits (Gerrit, Releases, Gating, etc). Another idea would be to gate
> the module with TripleO HA jobs.
> 
> The question is, under which umbrella put the module? Puppet ? TripleO ?
> 
> Or no umbrella, like puppet-ceph. <-- I like this idea
> 
> Any feedback is welcome,
> 
> [1] https://github.com/redhat-openstack/puppet-pacemaker

Seems like a module that would be useful outside of TripleO, so it
doesn't seem like it should live under that.  Other than that I don't
have enough knowledge of the organization of the puppet modules to comment.


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160209/e68acdc5/attachment.pgp>