Open Stack

I like the idea of moving it to use the OpenStack infrastructure.

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com> wrote:

> On 02/09/2016 08:05 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > TripleO is currently using puppet-pacemaker [1] which is a module hosted
> > & managed by Github.
> > The module was created and mainly maintained by Redhat. It tends to
> > break TripleO quite often since we don't have any gate.
> >
> > I propose to move the module to OpenStack so we'll use OpenStack Infra
> > benefits (Gerrit, Releases, Gating, etc). Another idea would be to gate
> > the module with TripleO HA jobs.
> >
> > The question is, under which umbrella put the module? Puppet ? TripleO ?
> >
> > Or no umbrella, like puppet-ceph. <-- I like this idea
>

I think the module not being under an umbrella makes sense.


> >
> > Any feedback is welcome,
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/redhat-openstack/puppet-pacemaker
>
> Seems like a module that would be useful outside of TripleO, so it
> doesn't seem like it should live under that.  Other than that I don't
> have enough knowledge of the organization of the puppet modules to comment.
>
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Juan Antonio Osorio R.
e-mail: jaosorior at gmail.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160210/59d39133/attachment.html>