Open Stack

On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, gordon chung wrote:

> my concern with #2 is, we will just end up going to thesaurus.com and
> searching for alternate words that mean the same general thing and
> this will be equally confusing. with the big tent, we essentially
> agreed that duplication is possible, so no matter how granular we make
> the scope, i'm not sure there's a way for any project to own a domain
> anymore. it seems this question is better addressed by addressing how
> the TC should handle big tent first?

It's just like you to cut straight to the crux of the biscuit.

I think this discussion is dancing around the edges of a referendum on
the "duplication" aspect of the big tent.

-- 
Chris Dent               (¨s¡ã¡õ¡ã)¨s¦à©ß©¥©ß            http://anticdent.org/
freenode: cdent                                         tw: @anticdent