Open Stack

Thanks for bringing this up Sean.

I went ahead and documented all the way the projects/gates/clients broke in
an etherpad: https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/v3-only-devstack

These are all the projects that I know that were affected, if someone knows
others, please add your findings.

Sean, you can count me in on the volunteering effort to get this
straightened out.

Steve

Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote on 2016/02/01 12:21:50 PM:

> From: Sean Dague <sean at dague.net>
> To: openstack-dev <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: 2016/02/01 12:23 PM
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [all] towards a keystone v3 only devstack
>
> On Friday last week I hit the go button on a keystone v3 default patch
> change in devstack. While that made it through tests for all the tightly
> integrated projects, we really should have stacked up some other spot
> tests to see how this was going to impact the rest of the ecosystem.
> Novaclient, shade, osc, and a bunch of other things started faceplanting.
>
> The revert is here - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/274703/ - and will
> move it's way through the gate once the tests complete.
>
> Going forward I think we need a more concrete plan on this transition.
> I'm going to be -2 on any v3 related keystone changes in devstack until
> we do, as it feels like we need to revert one of these patches about
> every month for the last 6.
>
> I don't really care what format the plan takes, ML thread, wiki page,
> spec. But we need one, and an owner (probably on the keystone side) to
> walk us through how this transition goes. This is going to include some
> point in the future where:
>
> 1. devstack configures v3 and v2 always, and devstack issues a warning
> if v2 is enabled
> 2. devstack configures v3 only, v2 can be enabled and v2 enabled is a
> warning
> 3. devstack removes v2 support
>
> The transition to stage 2 and stage 3 requires using Depends-On to stack
> up some wider collection of tests to demonstrate that this works on
> novaclient, heat, shade, osc, and anything that comes forward as being
> broken by this last round. It's fine if we give people hard deadlines
> that they need to get their jobs sorted, but like the removal of
> extras.d, we need to be explicit about it.
>
> So, first off, we need a volunteer to step up to pull together this
> plan. Any volunteers here?
>
>    -Sean
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe:
OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160201/ed5773ae/attachment.html>