Open Stack

Excerpts from Vladyslav Drok's message of 2016-12-14 17:11:56 +0200:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Ian Cordasco <sigmavirus24 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Joshua Hesketh <joshua.hesketh at gmail.com>
> > Reply: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) <
> > openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> > Date: December 14, 2016 at 06:56:22
> > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
> > openstack-infra <openstack-infra at lists.openstack.org>
> > Subject:  Re: [openstack-dev] [OpenStack-Infra] [all][stable][ptls]
> > Tagging liberty as EOL
> >
> > > The repos listed[0] have had stable/liberty branch removed and replaced
> > > with a liberty-eol tag. Any open reviews have been abandoned.
> > >
> > > Please let me know if there are any mistakes or latecomers to the list.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Josh
> > >
> > > [0]
> > > https://gist.githubusercontent.com/tbreeds/
> > 93cd346c37aa46269456f56649f0a4ac/raw/liberty_eol_data.txt
> >
> > Glance was late to the party, but it should have had its liberty branches
> > EOL'd as well.
> >
> > --
> > Ian Cordasco
> >
> 
> Also, after liberty was EOL'd and stable/liberty branches were removed,
> liberty release note pages need to be updated to reference liberty-eol tag
> instead of origin/stable/liberty, like done here
> https://review.openstack.org/410798 as a temporary solution, until this is
> fixed on the reno side (https://review.openstack.org/410792), if I get the
> situation correctly.
> 
> -Vlad

Because the other fix was behind a bunch of the rewrite work I'm doing
this cycle, we've set up a stable/newton branch for reno and I have an
alternative fix in https://review.openstack.org/410839. When we get that
merged, I'll release reno 1.9.0 with the fix.

Doug