[openstack-dev] [neutron] Changes to DNS integration behavior?

Hayes, Graham graham.hayes at hpe.com
Mon Dec 12 20:01:24 UTC 2016


On 12/12/2016 19:52, Kimball, Conrad wrote:
> We are in the early phases of a project to deploy OpenStack and we face
> the question of DNS integration when launching a VM instance.
>
>
>
> We have found the DNS Integration documentation at
> http://docs.openstack.org/mitaka/networking-guide/config-dns-int.html,
> but to our understanding it doesn’t do what we want to do.
>
>
>
> Where is the best forum for discussing possible changes in this behavior?
>
>

This would be a change to neutron, so it would their bugs / RFE
process [0]

I added [neutron] to the subject to grab their attention.

0 - http://docs.openstack.org/developer/neutron/policies/blueprints.html

>
> - - -
>
>
>
> Specifically, we do not tie DNS domains to networks – any particular
> network may have VM ports with a variety of DNS domains, with the choice
> of DNS domain left to the person deploying the VM instance (we use DNS
> domains to indicate business unit association, infrastructure function,
> and so forth).
>
>
>
> So we would want the DNS integration to allow specifying both a dns_name
> and a dns_domain when creating a port.  The documentation link above
> says this is allowed for floating IPs, but not for ports – ports can
> specify only a dns_name and always inherit the dns_domain from the network.
>
>
>
> /Conrad Kimball/
>
> Associate Technical Fellow
>
> Chief Architect, Enterprise Cloud Services
>
> Engineering, Operations & Technology / Information Technology / Core
> Infrastructure Engineering
>
> conrad.kimball at boeing.com <mailto:conrad.kimball at boeing.com>
>
> P.O. Box 3707, Mail Code 7M-TE
>
> Seattle, WA  98124-2207
>
> Bellevue 33-11 bldg, office 3A6-3.9
>
> Mobile:  425-591-7802
>
>
>




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list