Open Stack

On 08/22/2016 12:10 AM, Michael Still wrote:
> So, if this is about preserving CI time, then its cool for me to merge
> these on a US Sunday when the gate is otherwise idle, right?

yes.

>
> Michael
>
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net
> <mailto:sean at dague.net>> wrote:
>
>     On 08/18/2016 04:46 PM, Michael Still wrote:
>     > We're still ok with merging existing ones though?
>
>     Mostly we'd like to conserve the CI time now. It's about 14.5 node-hours
>     to run CI on these patches (probably on about 9 node-hours in the gate).
>     With ~800 nodes every patch represents 1.5% of our CI resources (per
>     hour) to pass through. There are a ton of these patches up there, so
>     even just landing gating ones consumes resources that could go towards
>     other more critical fixes / features.
>
>     I think the theory is these are fine to merge post freeze / milestone 3,
>     when the CI should have cooled down a bit and there is more head room.
>
>             -Sean
>
>     --
>     Sean Dague
>     http://dague.net
>
>     __________________________________________________________________________
>     OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>     Unsubscribe:
>     OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
>     <http://OpenStack-dev-request@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     <http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Rackspace Australia
>
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>


-- 
Sean Dague
http://dague.net