Open Stack

So, if this is about preserving CI time, then its cool for me to merge
these on a US Sunday when the gate is otherwise idle, right?

Michael

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:02 AM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:

> On 08/18/2016 04:46 PM, Michael Still wrote:
> > We're still ok with merging existing ones though?
>
> Mostly we'd like to conserve the CI time now. It's about 14.5 node-hours
> to run CI on these patches (probably on about 9 node-hours in the gate).
> With ~800 nodes every patch represents 1.5% of our CI resources (per
> hour) to pass through. There are a ton of these patches up there, so
> even just landing gating ones consumes resources that could go towards
> other more critical fixes / features.
>
> I think the theory is these are fine to merge post freeze / milestone 3,
> when the CI should have cooled down a bit and there is more head room.
>
>         -Sean
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
Rackspace Australia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160822/069efb3a/attachment.html>