Open Stack

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 8:36 AM, Sagi Shnaidman <sshnaidm at redhat.com> wrote:

> For making clear all advantages and disadvantages, I've created a doc:
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HmY-I8OzoJt0SzLzs79hCa1smKGltb-byrJOkKKGXII/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Please comment.
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Sagi Shnaidman <sshnaidm at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> John raised up the issue - where should we take tempest sources from.
>> I'm not sure where to take them from, so I bring it to wider discussion.
>>
>> Right now I use tempest from delorean packages. In comparison with
>> original tempest I don't see any difference in tests, only additional
>> configuration scripts:
>> https://github.com/openstack/tempest/compare/master...redhat-openstack:master
>> It's worth to mention that in case of delorean tempest the configuration
>> scripts fit tempest tests configuration, however in case of original
>> tempest repo it's required to change them and maintain according to very
>> dynamical configuration.
>>
>> So, do we need to use pure upstream tempest from current source and to
>> maintain configuration scripts or we can use packaged from delorean and not
>> duplicate effort of test teams?
>>
>> Thanks
>> --
>> Best regards
>> Sagi Shnaidman
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards
> Sagi Shnaidman
>


Hrm..  can't we use upstream tempest and the midstream configure script
that will be checked into tripleo upstream repos?
I don't think we need to make the choice you are proposing.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160418/73e0cb75/attachment.html>