For making clear all advantages and disadvantages, I've created a doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HmY-I8OzoJt0SzLzs79hCa1smKGltb-byrJOkKKGXII/edit?usp=sharing Please comment. On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Sagi Shnaidman <sshnaidm at redhat.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > John raised up the issue - where should we take tempest sources from. > I'm not sure where to take them from, so I bring it to wider discussion. > > Right now I use tempest from delorean packages. In comparison with > original tempest I don't see any difference in tests, only additional > configuration scripts: > https://github.com/openstack/tempest/compare/master...redhat-openstack:master > It's worth to mention that in case of delorean tempest the configuration > scripts fit tempest tests configuration, however in case of original > tempest repo it's required to change them and maintain according to very > dynamical configuration. > > So, do we need to use pure upstream tempest from current source and to > maintain configuration scripts or we can use packaged from delorean and not > duplicate effort of test teams? > > Thanks > -- > Best regards > Sagi Shnaidman > -- Best regards Sagi Shnaidman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20160418/f7e4e86b/attachment.html>