[openstack-dev] [OPNFV] [Functest] Tempest & Rally

Boris Pavlovic bpavlovic at mirantis.com
Fri Sep 25 12:10:50 UTC 2015


Jose,


Rally community provides official docker images here:
https://hub.docker.com/r/rallyforge/rally/
So I would suggest to use them.


Best regards,
Boris Pavlovic



On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Jose Lausuch <jose.lausuch at ericsson.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the hint Boris.
>
>
>
> Regarding what we do at functest with Rally, yes, we clone the latest from
> the Rally repo. We thought about that before and the possible errors it can
> convey, compatibility and so on.
>
>
>
> As I am working on a Docker image where all the Functest environment will
> be pre-installed, we might get rid of such potential problems. But, that
> image will need constant updates if there are major patches/bugfixes in the
> rally repo.
>
>
>
> What is your opinion on this? What do you think it makes more sense?
>
>
>
> /Jose
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* boris at pavlovic.ru [mailto:boris at pavlovic.ru] *On Behalf Of *Boris
> Pavlovic
> *Sent:* Friday, September 25, 2015 7:56 AM
> *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> *Cc:* EXT morgan.richomme at orange.com; Kosonen, Juha (Nokia - FI/Espoo);
> Jose Lausuch
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [OPNFV] [Functest] Tempest & Rally
>
>
>
> Morgan,
>
>
>
>
>
> You should add at least:
>
>
>
> sla:
>   failure_rate:
>     max: 0
>
>
>
> Otherwise rally will pass 100% no matter what is happening.
>
>
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Boris Pavlovic
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:29 PM, Tikkanen, Viktor (Nokia - FI/Espoo) <
> viktor.tikkanen at nokia.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Morgan
>
> and thank you for the overview.
>
> I'm now waiting for the POD#2 VPN profile (will be ready soon). We will
> try then to figure out what OpenStack/tempest/rally configuration changes
> are needed in order to get rid of those test failures.
>
> I suppose that most of the problems (like "Multiple possible networks
> found" etc.) are relatively easy to solve.
>
> BTW, since tempest is being currently developed in "branchless" mode
> (without release specific stable versions), do we have some common
> understanding/requirements how "dynamically" Functest should use its code?
>
> For example, config_functest.py seems to contain routines for
> cloning/installing rally (and indirectly tempest) code, does it mean that
> the code will be cloned/installed at the time when the test set is executed
> for the first time? (I'm just wondering if it is necessary or not to
> "freeze" somehow used code for each OPNFV release to make sure that it will
> remain compatible and that test results will be comparable between
> different OPNFV setups).
>
> -Viktor
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: EXT morgan.richomme at orange.com [mailto:morgan.richomme at orange.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 4:56 PM
> > To: Kosonen, Juha (Nokia - FI/Espoo); Tikkanen, Viktor (Nokia - FI/Espoo)
> > Cc: Jose Lausuch
> > Subject: [OPNFV] [Functest] Tempest & Rally
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I was wondering whether you could have a look at Rally/Tempest tests we
> > automatically launch in Functest.
> > We have still some errors and I assume most of them are due to
> > misconfiguration and/or quota ...
> > With Jose, we planned to have a look after SR0 but we do not have much
> > time and we are not fully skilled (even if we progressed a little bit:))
> >
> > If you could have a look and give your feedback, it would be very
> > helpful, we could discuss it during an IRC weekly meeting
> > In Arno we did not use the SLA criteria, that is also something we could
> > do for the B Release
> >
> > for instance if you look at
> > https://build.opnfv.org/ci/view/functest/job/functest-foreman-
> > master/19/consoleText
> >
> > you will see rally and Tempest log
> >
> > Rally scenario are a compilation of default Rally scenario played one
> > after the other and can be found in
> >
> https://git.opnfv.org/cgit/functest/tree/testcases/VIM/OpenStack/CI/suites
> >
> > the Rally artifacts are also pushed into the artifact server
> > http://artifacts.opnfv.org/
> > e.g.
> > http://artifacts.opnfv.org/functest/lf_pod2/2015-09-23_17-36-
> > 07/results/rally/opnfv-authenticate.html
> > look for 09-23 to get Rally json/html files and tempest.conf
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > Morgan
> >
> >
> >
> __________________________________________________________________________
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
> > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez
> > recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
> > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme
> ou
> > falsifie. Merci.
> >
> > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
> > information that may be protected by law;
> > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and
> > delete this message and its attachments.
> > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have
> been
> > modified, changed or falsified.
> > Thank you.
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Unsubscribe: OpenStack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20150925/e9f8776f/attachment.html>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list